Gaza Redevelopment Optics, U.S. Strategic Assertiveness, and Caribbean Diplomatic Fracture: For Trinidad and Tobago, This Is Not Conspiracy. It Is Momentum.
This essay is not written from expertise or institutional authority. It is written to assert what demands attention and invite reflection.
From the position of a layperson who has been, by her own admission, insufficiently engaged in the long arc of Israel–Palestine oversight—even as the United States and the global order repeatedly convulse around it. That absence does not produce clarity; it produces dissonance. And it is from that dissonance that questions arise, unpolished but sincere.
The question that keeps returning—quietly, persistently—is not theatrical. It is civic. It is practical. It is about proximity and consequence.
The Atmosphere We Are In
The world did not arrive at this moment by accident. Under the Trump administration, exhaustion was elevated into governance. Chaos was not incidental; it was performative. Norms were strained until they lost meaning. Spectacle replaced deliberation. Disruption became its own justification.
That posture did not disappear with a change of administration. It lingered—as precedent, as permission, as proof that the abnormal could be normalized and sustained.
It is within this atmosphere that reporting surfaced of a Gaza redevelopment initiative described as “Project Sunrise,” estimated around US$112B over a decade, and reported as developed by a team led by Jared Kushner and U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, as relayed by The Times of Israel citing The Wall Street Journal. [1]
The issue here is not whether Gaza will one day need rebuilding. It will. The issue is optics. When devastation is reframed as opportunity before justice is resolved; when displacement becomes a development variable; when human loss is abstracted into renderings and investment language—the signal sent is not renewal, but comfort with redesigning reality after rupture.
Dogma Versus Political Reality
Religious language hovers persistently over Israel–Palestine, but it does not govern it. States act for power, security, leverage, and alignment. Faith is often invoked not as cause, but as cover—a way to sanctify decisions that would otherwise demand moral reckoning.
What repels many observers is not belief itself, but the ease with which suffering is framed as inevitable and strategy is shielded from scrutiny by inherited narratives. The dissonance lies between dogma invoked and politics practiced.
From the vantage point of a layperson, this dissonance is often felt before it is fully understood. My language is sometimes vernacular—unfinished—because I’m not writing from study; I’m writing from watching. That limitation is not a reason for silence; it is the reason for speaking. To articulate confusion is not to claim authority; it is to resist complacency and move, however imperfectly, from being misinformed toward being responsibly informed.
It also matters to say plainly what is often blurred: religion does not map cleanly onto government policy. Israel is a secular democracy with religious influence, not a theocracy. Jewish belief does not prescribe modern state governance. Christian support for Israel is not monolithic; it ranges from theological Zionism to political advocacy to solidarity with civilians on all sides.
Why the Caribbean Enters the Frame
Once the tension between belief and power becomes visible in one place, it sharpens perception elsewhere. That sharpened perception now rests uneasily on Trinidad and Tobago.
Recent reporting and public debate have focused on U.S. military access and activity, including concern in Tobago over what some political voices described as a suspected U.S. “military base” operating alongside a radar installation at or near ANR Robinson International Airport. [4] (Guardian TT)
Former Prime Minister Dr. Keith Rowley has publicly expressed disappointment regarding U.S. military access being granted to national airports, raising questions of transparency and long-term strategic implication. [5] (Guardian TT)
Kamla Persad-Bissessar and the Precision of “National Interest First”
Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s recent statements sharpened the regional debate by explicitly distancing Trinidad and Tobago from a CARICOM position critical of U.S. travel restrictions, characterizing CARICOM as “not a reliable partner,” and framing her government’s stance as “Our National Interest First.” In the same posture, she defended the sovereign right of the United States to set border policy and signaled that Trinidad and Tobago would not bind itself to the ideologies or foreign-policy positions of other member states. Whether one reads this as necessary realism or destabilizing unilateralism, the impact is measurable: it reframes CARICOM consultation from standard practice into optional courtesy—and it recasts U.S. alignment as the primary security hedge. [6][7] (Tobago Updates TV / CNC3; i955 FM)
CARICOM Dissent and the Interruption of Facts
That reframing did not land quietly. Reporting reflects former Prime Minister Dr. Keith Rowley criticizing the posture and warning about the cost of weakening CARICOM at a critical moment for the region. [2] (Barbados Today)
Antigua and Barbuda’s Prime Minister Gaston Browne responded with numbers rather than rhetoric. Commentary attributed to him emphasized that CARICOM is not a liability to Trinidad and Tobago but a major economic advantage—highlighting that Trinidad and Tobago reportedly earned over US $1.1 billion from trade with CARICOM in 2024 and has long maintained a dominant trade surplus within the Community. [3] (Pearce Robinson)
The structural point beneath that argument is difficult to ignore: advantages do not float in air. They are carried by shared mechanisms—tariff protections, negotiated access, and markets sustained by regional solidarity. When that architecture is publicly questioned by one of its principal beneficiaries, it weakens the collective platform just as external pressure rises. [3]
Other leaders have defended regional cohesion. Prime Minister Mia Mottley of Barbados has repeatedly argued that small states do not gain leverage by isolating themselves, and that consultation is not disloyalty but survival in a world of power asymmetry. [9]
Beyond CARICOM, Mexico’s leadership has repeatedly emphasized principles of sovereignty and non-intervention in response to unilateral actions and extraterritorial pressure— positions that many in the hemisphere watch closely when U.S. policy hardens. [10]
Venezuela, Security, and the Cost of Alignment
Overlaying all of this is Trinidad and Tobago’s proximity to Venezuela—and the way regional security narratives intensify when U.S.–Venezuela tensions rise. Engagement with the United States is not optional for Caribbean states; it is structural. The concern is not engagement itself, but alignment without insulation—when the downstream consequences of great-power action are borne by smaller states with limited influence over outcomes.
That is why reporting about violence, lives lost, and unresolved justice elsewhere lands differently in small states. When force is applied far away and accountability remains contested, nearby states pay attention—because geopolitical collateral rarely lands where decisions are made. [8]
What Momentum Looks Like
What links Gaza redevelopment optics, U.S. strategic assertiveness, and Caribbean diplomatic fracture is not conspiracy.
Momentum favors speed over deliberation. Momentum rewards unilateral clarity over collective patience. Momentum pressures small states to decide quickly—often before public understanding has caught up.
Trinidad and Tobago is not facing invasion. But it is being positioned—through permissions, alignments, and redefinitions of solidarity. Positioning is quieter than force, and far more enduring.
A Closing Without Certainty—But Not Without Care
This is not written to inflame, instruct, or predict. It is written to bear witness while choices are still being made.
To ask why is not to accuse. To question momentum is not to deny sovereignty. To speak from imperfect language is not ignorance—it is civic participation.
History shows that small nations rarely lose agency through sudden rupture. They lose it through drift—when momentum is mistaken for inevitability.
Grace Notes
No hype. Just facts. And the refusal to look away.
There are moments when watching becomes unavoidable.
Not because something explodes, but because things begin to line up—quietly, insistently. Statements echo one another. Permissions are granted. Rebuttals follow. Aircraft land. Trade figures surface. Regional language hardens. None of these moments are extraordinary on their own. Together, they form a pattern that asks to be noticed.
Sources Appendix
Sources include primary reporting, official statements, and reported commentary. Interpretive analysis is offered as civic inquiry—not allegation—and is grounded in publicly available material.
- [1] Times of Israel, citing The Wall Street Journal. “Project Sunrise” reporting on proposed Gaza redevelopment and estimated costs. https://share.google/BFrBVHnXtzagj1tsU
- [2] Barbados Today. Reporting on Keith Rowley’s critique and CARICOM implications. https://bit.ly/3L8yHnE
- [3] Pearce Robinson (Facebook). Summary attributed to PM Gaston Browne on CARICOM trade figures and regional interdependence. https://www.facebook.com/PearceRobinsonOfficial/posts/pfbid02Tr3Cf3wAAUz35mucVqHC2dT8zwyErywTVCV71vVtMQbWjU6DdkkbbT5w8uAxVKcUl
- [4] Trinidad and Tobago Guardian. “Alarm over suspected U.S. military base in Tobago.” https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/alarm-over-suspected-us-military-base-in-tobago-6.2.2476251.eeb22a306a
- [5] Trinidad and Tobago Guardian. “Rowley disappointed U.S. military given access to airports.” https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/rowley-disappointed-us-military-given-access-to-airports-6.2.2473123.1639bf86f3
- [6] Tobago Updates TV / CNC3 (Facebook). Reporting on PM Persad-Bissessar statement and “National Interest First” framing. https://www.facebook.com/tobagoupdatestv/posts/pfbid0h8JH3gymPP8KbbWddnNaDkUs8iPTAWfLWRwfwFJNrfyMb4jYo6rQZYhuDbW5tCJvl
- [7] i955 FM (Facebook). Coverage of CARICOM–U.S. visa restrictions dispute and diplomatic fallout. https://www.facebook.com/i955fm/posts/pfbid0FqPVDTNyXWatr52E3FgoaxhEEpgSckD9yN4zV9ubQXZeGzrz5knKSCyEkr3aHmX9l
- [8] Trinidad and Tobago Guardian. “No justice yet…” (link to be updated with the full Guardian URL). https://www.guardian.co.tt/…/no-justice-yet-for-chad…
- [9] Government of Barbados. Official statements/speeches by PM Mia Mottley on Caribbean unity and multilateral engagement. (Official government sources.)
- [10] Government of Mexico. Official statements on sovereignty and non-intervention. (Official government sources.)
Reader note: This essay distinguishes between what is publicly documented, what is reported by reputable outlets, and what remains unconfirmed. Where interpretation appears, it is offered as civic inquiry—not as accusation.
Comments
Post a Comment