NO ACTUAL PEACE SETTLEMENT — AND THE GOVERNMENT IS STILL SHUT DOWN
No Peace — and the Government is Still Shut Down

Handshakes and headlines aren’t peace — and a nation in shutdown cannot mediate the world’s healing.
There is a fine line between truth and its staging. We live in an era where newsrooms, influencers, and digital oracles perform as rival choirs, each singing its own hymn of righteousness. Depending on where we listen, we are either saved or condemned by our political preferences. And so, when the spectacle of a “Peace Signing Agreement” in the Middle East floods our screens—flags, handshakes, released hostages, tears—it feels momentous. Yet, beneath the choreography, we must ask: what peace, and whose peace, are we applauding?
The Theatre of Accord
What was celebrated this week was not a final peace treaty between Israel and Gaza, but a ceasefire and prisoner–hostage exchange—a pause brokered mainly by Qatar, Egypt, and the United States. These mediators—Qatar’s leadership, Egypt’s intelligence chief Abbas Kamel, Israel’s Mossad director David Barnea, and U.S. CIA leadership—have quietly shaped each round of negotiation.
Trump’s presence at the ceremonial signing is symbolic, not structural. The months of shuttle diplomacy that built this framework existed long before the cameras rolled; the Qatar–Egypt–U.S. channel produced the template first seen in late 2023. This is not a revival of the Abraham Accords; it is a limited humanitarian arrangement intended to exchange lives and ease siege conditions.
- Releases of the final Israeli hostages in exchange for roughly 1,900–2,000 Palestinian detainees.
- Initiation of remains recovery and partial troop repositioning, with many details unsettled.
- Humanitarian scale-up commitments that remain fragile and contingent.
Even optimistic briefings admit this is a first stage, not full peace. The deeper structure—governance of Gaza, durable security, accountability, and reconstruction—remains unresolved.
The Receipts of Reality
To stay exacting and fair:
Hamas committed crimes against humanity and war crimes on October 7—deliberate killings of civilians and hostage-taking. (documented in major human rights investigations)
Israeli forces in Gaza have been found by UN and rights organizations to have committed grave violations, including actions assessed as war crimes and collective punishment. (contested in politics, but formal findings exist and require scrutiny)
These are allegations and findings under international law. Courts and states still argue over them. But the documentation exists and deserves accountability.
The Domestic Parallel — A Government in Paralysis
While the world applauds a ceremony abroad, the U.S. government remains shut down. Thousands of federal workers and contractors are unpaid, essential programs stall, and long-term projects fracture. The shutdown reflects a standoff between the White House and congressional Democrats over health-care subsidies and spending terms; with Republicans holding both chambers, floor strategy and leverage to bring up votes rests largely with the majority—but any solution still needs bipartisan votes and a presidential signature.
It is, in another register, a hostage situation—not of bodies, but of livelihoods.
Who Holds Whom Hostage?
In Gaza, civilians are the currency of political endurance. In Washington, federal employees’ pay and public services become bargaining chips. Each side claims moral justification; each inflicts measurable harm on ordinary people caught between power and pride. Optics justify the injury.
The Veneer of Public Persuasion
We are hypnotized by optics: handshakes, press conferences, emotional homecomings. We see motion and conclude resolution. But the real work of peace—disarmament, restitution, justice, and reconstruction—takes years and is rarely televised. The same administration lauded for “ending a war” presides over a domestic shutdown that starves its own citizens of stability. If this is governance, it is governance by display. If this is peace, it is peace by projection.
Grace Notes Reflection (Revised)
I watch not as a partisan, but as a citizen trained by experience to read the margins. My allegiance is not to the noise of applause, but to the quiet reckoning of facts. There is no actual peace settlement, only the yearning for one. There is no functional government, only the parade of one.
And yet, hope persists—in the stubborn belief that truth, even when whispered beneath the din of propaganda, still matters.
As I wrote, I was reminded of Susan Sontag’s warning in Regarding the Pain of Others: that the images of suffering and triumph we are shown can soothe conscience while obscuring reality. She argued that looking is not the same as understanding—and that spectatorship, when left unquestioned, can dull the very empathy it intends to stir.
So I end not in despair, but in insistence: do not confuse the photograph of peace with peace itself, nor the performance of governance with the act of governing. The work ahead—at home and abroad—demands more than ceremony; it demands conscience, endurance, and the courage to keep looking even when the images grow too bright or too dark to bear.
Sources & Suggested Reading
- Wire/agency coverage of ceasefire–hostage frameworks (Qatar–Egypt–U.S. mediation; phases; prisoner numbers; remains recovery).
- UN OHCHR, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International reporting on violations of international humanitarian law (2023–2025).
- ICRC advisories on remains recovery and humanitarian access in Gaza.
- U.S. shutdown explainers and live coverage (CBO / Harvard Kennedy School on impacts; congressional floor control dynamics; party statements).
- Susan Sontag, Regarding the Pain of Others (FSG, 2003).
Note: This essay cites publicly available reports and major-agency coverage to focus readers on verifiable, primary-source–driven context.
Comments
Post a Comment