Some days feel like a long purgatory. I find myself carrying the weight of headlines like extra baggage—drained, conflicted, and quietly asking: how long must this last? It is as if we are eavesdropping on the great ledger of government, watching the costs rise, yet never seeing them fully tallied. Security details, one-day meetings that cost millions, legal battles and settlements—the public bill grows, while the human toll deepens. Careers are disrupted, voices are muted, and trust thins to a fragile thread.

This is not a matter of red or blue, left or right, but of humane indiscretions. The media cycle leaves us spiritually and mentally exhausted, while public figures are elevated, martyred, or discredited in turn. We watch with paralyzed observation, caught between truths and untruths, craving clarity.

And so the “what next” gathers: midterms, impeachment, removal, the name-calling of the 25th Amendment. What are we to make of these things? Here are some truths worth holding onto…

Eavesdropping on Power: When the Costs Rise and the Voices Dim

Sometimes I feel as if I’m eavesdropping on a great, unending ledger—the billowing costs underwritten by the present machinery of government, the sums we never see itemized in their entirety but only whispered through updates and briefings. The enormity feels staggering: the everyday expense of security and convenings, the bandwidth consumed by litigation and investigations, the ambient price of public fatigue. Beyond line items is a heavier toll—lives disrupted, careers displaced, trust thinned to a filament.

It isn’t left or right, not red or blue. It’s about humane indiscretions—how quickly people in public service, heads of agencies, even lawmakers can be discredited, dismissed, or indicted. When voices are muted or menaced because their words aren’t welcome, what does that teach the rest of us about speaking?

Maybe I am misguided in my presumptions; maybe I’m just an exhausted arbiter of truths and untruths, caught between what is revealed and what is withheld. The profusion of media and orchestrated distraction is spiritually, emotionally, and mentally crippling. We martyr public figures and pay homage to spectacle; indignities play on repeat, and we watch—paralyzed.

This is where the “what next” taunts. Midterms loom. Hypotheticals gather like storm clouds: impeachment, removal, or the noisy invocation of the 25th Amendment. The names of processes are hurled more than understood. So here are the facts we can hold, because literacy is steadier than outrage:

We are not pawns if we understand the game.

The Hard Facts of Process

Impeachment is not removal. The House can impeach a sitting President (a formal accusation) with a simple majority. Removal comes only if the Senate, in trial, votes to convict by a two-thirds supermajority. Without that, the President remains in office.

A midterm is not a revolution. If control of the House flips, a majority can initiate and pass articles of impeachment. But the constitutional math for conviction lives in the Senate—and it’s intentionally steep. One election doesn’t erase another.

The 25th Amendment is not punishment. It addresses incapacity, not misconduct. It allows the Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet to declare the President unable to discharge the duties of the office, subject to contest and, if disputed, to congressional resolution. It is a safeguard, not a partisan shortcut.

Witnessing Ourselves

These guardrails can feel maddening, especially when misuses of power seem obvious and the public cost of miseries keeps rising. Yet the system is designed to resist sudden overthrow—an antidote to coups, even at the cost of prolonging injustice. That tension is where we live now.

Knowing this doesn’t fix exhaustion, but it clarifies it. Civic literacy is a form of self-defense: understanding what impeachment can and cannot do, what midterms can and cannot change, and where the 25th sits in the landscape of law.

Remedies for the Plague of the Long Haul

One way to endure this long season of turbulence is to practice what I call news hygiene. Rather than drowning in a constant drip of alerts, choose set windows—morning and evening—and rely on only a couple of trusted sources. Depth is steadier than distraction.

Another remedy is to swap doom for documents. Set aside an hour each week to read the primary texts themselves—constitutional provisions, committee reports, court opinions. Rumor loses its power when record takes its place.

We also restore ourselves by bringing agency close to home. Attend one tangible gathering in your own zip code—a school board session, a safety forum, a budget hearing. Proximity restores perspective. And do this not alone, but with others. Form a small circle of three to five, share the roles of reader, summarizer, planner. Accountability is lighter when carried together.

Our spirits need ritual as much as our minds need knowledge. Protect hours each week for writing, music, craft, or simply walking. Liberation requires a body that can carry it. Name a horizon for yourself—perhaps a ninety-day civic goal, like learning your state’s election process or meeting your city council member. Mark it on a calendar and trace the steps backward.

Finally, refuse the false binaries. It is possible to demand accountability and still honor due process; possible to critique power and still defend institutions worth reforming. This is how we survive the long haul: with steadiness, with nuance, with care for both the world and ourselves.

A Closing Meditation

We are not powerless if we can read the map. We are not voiceless if we still ask hard questions in public. Yes, turbulence is real. Yes, the law binds change to slow chains. But witness is work, and clarity is care. The rights of all for the best of all may feel fraught, yet they are not extinguished—they’re tested. And while the ledger of power keeps growing, the quiet rebellion remains the same: know the rules, guard your spirit, take the next faithful step.

Grace Notes in Context: Where understanding is not an afterthought but a daily practice; where the long haul is met with literate hope.

---

Note: This essay describes constitutional processes for public understanding and does not accuse any named individual of unlawful conduct.